Post image for The “Better Than Average Effect”

It’s maddening to know someone who refuses to change their mind about an issue even when presented with evidence proving them wrong. Social psychologists call this “cognitive dissonance,” and as infuriating as it is for the rest of us, being wrong is so psychically uncomfortable for these people that they’ll avoid any situation that heightens the “disconnect” between their belief and evidence to the contrary. Some go further and seek out support among others who hold similar, equally erroneous beliefs. Though I’m only half kidding here, surely the collective noun for a group of cognitively dissonant people would have to be “PETA.”

Social psychologists are aware of another phenomenon that we as fanciers would recognize in several manifestations. Haven’t we all known someone who, for example, has an exaggerated opinion of how much he or she actually knows about dogs? Perhaps it’s the person who judges dogs entirely differently than what he actually breeds, himself, or the newbie who’s been “in” their breed for all of fifteen minutes but after a couple of wins in the ring, is now an expert.

The name for this social phenomenon is the “Better Than Average Effect,” or BTAE, and in reality, most of us exhibit this trait in varying degrees. In our heart of hearts, we tend to evaluate ourselves more positively than we evaluate other people by thinking that we are above normal in a variety of areas. Statistically, this is impossible because everyone can’t be better than average, but one Penn State research student, Sasha Thomas, found a group in which the “Better Than Average effect” appears in abundance: Dog owners.

Based on a survey Thomas developed for pet owners, she found that dog owners exhibit the “Better Than Average Effect” more so than cat owners. Thomas believes that through a kind of cognitive dissonance, dog owners psychologically believe they have a “one of a kind,” or better than average dog. If you ask me, this describes a lot of us who were smitten with our very first show dog and couldn’t understand why the dog didn’t win more.

Psychologists studying the BTAE (also known as the “Lake Wobegon Effect” after Garrison Keillor’s fictional town where “all the children are above average”) have found that the more important an attribute is to us, the stronger the effect is. This might be why a fancier professes to have more dog knowledge than he or she actually has because in our competitive world, this is a high-value attribute.

The Better Than Average Effect is a measurement we determine for ourselves, and it can be a good thing when it helps us overcome obstacles, meet challenges and in general, feel better about ourselves. It becomes a problem, however, when the decisions we make based on knowledge we think we have impacts others: The judge who believes herself to be proficient at identifying breed type but makes placements in the ring that prove otherwise; the club member who strong arms his way into a position of authority and responsibility only to get in over his head quickly.

It doesn’t take long to wander into the area of conjecture. If the average dog owner exhibits a stronger “Better Than Average Effect,” doesn’t it stand to reason that the dog fancy invites, if not exacerbates, The Effect in people who gravitate to the sport because of their love of dogs?

I suspect it does. Social psychologists seeking to deconstruct the BTAE phenomenon found several factors which heighten the Better Than Average Effect, and I find a couple of them to be problematic in a sport that values balance and is supposed to encourage excellence, both in our dogs and ourselves.

Researchers found that motive plays a role in the outcome of “self” versus average-peer judgments, and that these judgments are made “relationally” rather than independently. In plain English, this means that in competition (read: the dog fancy environment) there’s no advantage in being inexperienced or unknowledgeable, and if anything, the “Better than Average Effect” is a survival mechanism. In my view, this hurts us. Evaluating dogs is a life long learning process, but real growth can’t come without knowing what we don’t know and feeling empowered to admit it. If it’s better to be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt (Mark Twain), wouldn’t it be great to be able to say, “I don’t know” without fear of feeling diminished so that we can get on with the business of constructive learning?

Veterans in the sport have observed for some time that “newbies” these days don’t seem to express interest in learning the history of their breed; some old timers go further by complaining that instant gratification is now the name of the game. I’m not sure that this is entirely new because waaayyyyy back in 1978 when I started out, the average “life span” of someone entering the sport was 5-7 years. That said, I do think there’s greater pressure now to enter a ring and leave with a ribbon. It seems, too, that there are fewer learning opportunities offered now than there was back in 1978 when at any given time, a seminar lead by Quentin LaHam, Rachel Paige Elliot or Pat Hastings could be found, and they’d be well attended by seasoned fanciers as well as beginners.   Sitting shoulder to shoulder with people who’d forgotten more than I knew took the sting out of being so new. It encouraged me to learn more.

Maybe this phenomenon is bigger we realize and it simply permeates the entire culture, but as sports go, the dog fancy is a bit of a fish bowl: Swim around it a few times and everybody knows everyone. Blunders aren’t quickly forgotten, and reinventing oneself after a rocky start is tough. The sport can only improve if we as fanciers, competitors, delegates, judges and club members foster a climate where it’s “ok” to not know something, then provide opportunities to learn the breed and our craft, if not mentor someone, ourselves.

If it’s true that the road to self-insight runs through other people, perhaps it’s time to get aggressive about being the kind of people we wish we knew when we started out.

This article first appeared in Dogs in Review,  July 2015

{ 0 comments }

The Times They Are a Changin’

June 4, 2015
Thumbnail image for The Times They Are a Changin’

A Pew Research Center recently released the results of a study that are startling when looked at backwards. The percentage of single people who are American-born between 1971 and 1985 has gone from 16% to 46% in one generation. To rephrase: The number of 30-to-44-year olds who are single will have nearly tripled in just […]

Read the full article →

National Purebred Dog Day 2015: A Review

May 11, 2015

Now that National Purebred Dog Day 2015 is in the rearview mirror and there’s been a chance to assess and reflect, can the day be considered a success, and if so, by what measure? Did it have an impact, what can be learned from it, and where do we go from here? To answer one […]

Read the full article →

May 1, 2015 National Purebred Dog Day Fun Photo Challenge

April 27, 2015

These Rules Apply to Each Photo Challenge Listed Below Unless Otherwise Indicated: 1) Limit one photo submission per person per “challenge;” 2) Photo caption must indicate the name of the challenge for which it is competing, or it will be put into the “general” contest (see below); 3) Each photo must include a purebred dog(s). […]

Read the full article →

Game Day and the Game Plan

April 22, 2015

In about a week, we’ll be celebrating National Purebred Dog Day. Technically, it will be the second time the day has been observed, but the first time since the State of Colorado officially recognized it last month. Since its inception, the guiding force behind the day is to “celebrate the diversity, heritage and predictability of […]

Read the full article →

The White Noise in our Sport

March 25, 2015
Thumbnail image for The White Noise in our Sport

Two women had no business trying to lift such an awkward piece of furniture, but what could I do. The lady had wandered through the open front door of my new house and insisted on being a good neighbor by helping move a chest of drawers. Despite my objections, she lifted the end nearest her […]

Read the full article →

National Purebred Dog Day’s Toolbox

March 16, 2015
Thumbnail image for National Purebred Dog Day’s Toolbox

Of all the things running through my head during last week’s vote to recognize May 1 as National Purebred Dog Day, unbridled joy was not one of them. Sitting as I was in the inner sanctum of the Colorado State Capitol, I could have been expected to be giddy, if not nervous, as I watched legislators […]

Read the full article →

Who’s Your Daddy?

February 3, 2015
Thumbnail image for Who’s Your Daddy?

Normally, a good storm can reveal where the leaks are in a boat, but the tempest that was the “GoDaddy” commercial last week did little more than puzzle me. By all accounts, GoDaddy’s now-famously misguided commercial (named, “Journey Home”) was intended to be a parody of Budweiser’s “Lost Puppy” ad for the Super Bowl. In […]

Read the full article →

Why Have Rules?

January 13, 2015
Thumbnail image for Why Have Rules?

The midterm elections are now well behind us now, though some of us are still be afraid to answer the phone lest a “robo-caller” be at the other end. Despite the mind-numbing frequency of political ads, the elections put many of us in the mood to do our civic duty with pride. We paid attention […]

Read the full article →